HIDDEN HAND INTERVIEW | ILLUMINATI INSIDER

Exploring the depths of conspiracy reality

The deeper someone explores this connection between government leaders and global corporations, the more evident the subversion and the extent of the manipulation become. Yet often, the real agenda remains hidden behind the apparent quest for more power and resources, and it remains inaccessible to many people because it needs a spiritual understanding of the more profound correlation. Therefore even for ambitious researchers of that matter, the real agenda or intentions of the Illuminati remain blurred. However, after some deep digging, most individuals can recognize a particular recurring pattern.

Of course, most people have neither the interest nor the capacity to deal with this issue. Psychologically, it is undoubtedly rather unsettling or even scary to surrender to the idea that the Illuminati are more than an imagination. Skeptics can easily discard this whole concept. The most obvious argument to negate this notion lies in the fact that this myth of a secret organization can be found everywhere. Even in mainstream pop-culture, the Illuminati are omnipresent. So how could a secret society like the Illuminati remain hidden, when everybody is aware of them? This question is an often-heard argument to reject this idea or belief in a secret society controlling the world.

Deeper implications of Illuminati research

However, today I would claim from my perspective that my search has sent me on a journey – a journey that has brought me closer to myself. This wording may sound very abstract, but the research included a fundamentally deep insight into my reality and my responsibilities in this context. You might understand once you read the Hidden Hand Interview.

Along this journey through various books, from Fritz Springmeier to David Icke, a holistic image crystallized. This investigation included many lectures and personal interviews with other researchers on this subject. The bigger puzzle picture seems to be very abstract indeed, but despite various uncertainties and concealed areas, my interdisciplinary blueprint of the Illuminati became consistent—unfortunately, also very complex.

Hidden Hand on Above Top Secret forum

In 2013, with my already complex but still limited understanding, I found a protocol that had already been available in the public domain since 2008, but which got relatively little attention from the masses—talking about the “Hidden Hand Interview.” Adepts of Illuminati research passed it around like the holy grail. I guess even most people inside the truther-movement considered it to be “too far out.” I reckon that most researchers of this matter, who were able to find value in this document, at least for themselves, also understood that even in the circles of diehard conspiracy theorists, this interview would lead to skepticism and mistrust.

Although I got confronted with this general idea of a secret society from 1996 on, I was probably first willing to accept the Hidden Hand Interview as a critical source of information ten years after my peak interest in 2003. This delay is primarily based on the fact that the author did not bother to prove his statements. Unlike many other severe publications about the Illuminati, which at least somehow try to deliver a specific chain of evidence, “Hidden Hand”—so the pseudonym—was never trying to convince anyone.

The interview on “Above Top Secret“ developed as follows. In 2008, a user with the alias “Hidden Hand“ appeared in this forum and claimed to be part of the organization of the Illuminati and offered to respond to profound questions. The reason why I deeply resonated with this interview is easily explained by the fact that “Hidden Hand” described the essence of my 10-year research. He also provided other puzzle pieces, which completed and filled white spots within my inner picture. He did this in a highly condensed form, not bothered with justifications or even trying to give evidence. Everything was simply presented as fact.

When I look at the document in its entirety, 80% of the content presented did not require evidence to me because I already had verified these claims in my research. On top of that, the interview contained about 10% of those puzzle pieces that coherently enriched the overall picture. Of course, the material left a residual amount of question marks, where I’m still not sure whether Hidden Hand himself is a victim to indoctrination or false beliefs. This reality could be possible, as well. I do not feel that he or she has deliberately spread incorrect information. Instead, I tend to evaluate the idea that this person and his/her intention to bring clarity to the matter is honest. At least I feel Hidden Hand was not lying. He believed in what he had to say.